mobile app

iFirstAid: Redesigning Emergency Response

COMPANY

iFirstaid

ROLE

UX Consultant

EXPERTISE

UX/UI Design

YEAR

2022

Project Description

Intial State Analysis

User Interviews

User Flows

Wireframes

Improvements

Conclusion

Project description

In 2022, SURVIVAL, Australia's prominent first aid kit provider, faced a critical challenge with their iFirstAid mobile app. Despite having valuable life-saving content, their app was failing to serve users in emergency moments when it mattered most. Users were struggling to access vital information quickly, and engagement metrics showed concerning patterns of abandonment during critical scenarios.


This case study explores our 18-month journey to transform iFirstAid from a well-intentioned but problematic app into one of Australia's leading emergency response tools. The project demanded we rethink traditional UX paradigms and create new patterns for emergency-focused design.

In 2022, SURVIVAL, Australia's prominent first aid kit provider, faced a critical challenge with their iFirstAid mobile app. Despite having valuable life-saving content, their app was failing to serve users in emergency moments when it mattered most. Users were struggling to access vital information quickly, and engagement metrics showed concerning patterns of abandonment during critical scenarios.


This case study explores our 18-month journey to transform iFirstAid from a well-intentioned but problematic app into one of Australia's leading emergency response tools. The project demanded we rethink traditional UX paradigms and create new patterns for emergency-focused design.

Timeline

18 months

Background

I worked on this project at smile CDR, while also working on multiple other products.

Role

End to end designer - UI Architecture, UX Design, Visual Design, UX Research working with 1 other designer on this project

⭐️

Connect to Content

Add layers or components to make infinite auto-playing slideshows.

Initial State Analysis

This wasn't just another app redesign. Our research revealed that 67% of users considered immediate access to first aid instructions "essential," yet the existing app was creating barriers to this critical information. We were dealing with an application where user experience could literally mean the difference between life and death.

"We should convey that we're here to help, not to sell first aid." - CEO

Heuristic Analysis

I began with an exhaustive screen-by-screen analysis of the existing application, while the other designer conducted a parallel heuristic evaluation. When we combined our findings, clear patterns emerged - from critical usability issues to subtle interaction pain points. These insights were powerfully validated during our user testing sessions, where participants struggled with the exact issues we'd identified.

Barriers Before Life-Saving Aid

In emergency response, requiring users to log in before accessing critical information created a dangerous barrier. As one user put it, 'If someone is bleeding, I'm not going to waste time logging into an app.'

This wasn't just a usability issue - it was a critical safety concern that demanded immediate transformation. Emergency information should be instantly accessible, with optional authentication reserved for non-critical features.

In emergency response, requiring users to log in before accessing critical information created a dangerous barrier. As one user put it, 'If someone is bleeding, I'm not going to waste time logging into an app.'


This wasn't just a usability issue - it was a critical safety concern that demanded immediate transformation. Emergency information should be instantly accessible, with optional authentication reserved for non-critical features.

In emergency response, requiring users to log in before accessing critical information created a dangerous barrier. As one user put it, 'If someone is bleeding, I'm not going to waste time logging into an app.'


This wasn't just a usability issue - it was a critical safety concern that demanded immediate transformation. Emergency information should be instantly accessible, with optional authentication reserved for non-critical features.

Barriers Before Life-Saving Aid - 2

Forcing users to download videos before accessing emergency help creates a dangerous barrier. In critical moments, users can't afford to waste precious seconds on download prompts - they need immediate access to life-saving information.

Even for non-emergency users, requesting downloads before demonstrating value creates an instant trust deficit. The prompt fails to answer critical questions: How much space? What content? Why download? This creates an immediate trust deficit at the app's first meaningful interaction. This appears to be a feature built for technical convenience rather than user safety.

Forcing users to download videos before accessing emergency help creates a dangerous barrier. In critical moments, users can't afford to waste precious seconds on download prompts - they need immediate access to life-saving information.

Even for non-emergency users, requesting downloads before demonstrating value creates an instant trust deficit. The prompt fails to answer critical questions: How much space? What content? Why download? This creates an immediate trust deficit at the app's first meaningful interaction. This appears to be a feature built for technical convenience rather than user safety.

Forcing users to download videos before accessing emergency help creates a dangerous barrier. In critical moments, users can't afford to waste precious seconds on download prompts - they need immediate access to life-saving information.

Even for non-emergency users, requesting downloads before demonstrating value creates an instant trust deficit. The prompt fails to answer critical questions: How much space? What content? Why download? This creates an immediate trust deficit at the app's first meaningful interaction. This appears to be a feature built for technical convenience rather than user safety.

Navigation Barriers in Critical Moments

The problems start at the brand level - the logo placement wastes prime screen space, adhering to outdated web conventions rather than prioritizing emergency access.


The app's navigation reveals dangerous confusion around emergency functions. Users face an ambiguous choice between 'Call for Help' and 'Emergency' buttons - a critical design flaw when seconds count. In a crisis, no one should have to guess which button connects them to help, or find CPR instructions scattered across different sections.

The problems start at the brand level - the logo placement wastes prime screen space, adhering to outdated web conventions rather than prioritizing emergency access.

The app's navigation reveals dangerous confusion around emergency functions. Users face an ambiguous choice between 'Call for Help' and 'Emergency' buttons - a critical design flaw when seconds count. In a crisis, no one should have to guess which button connects them to help, or find CPR instructions scattered across different sections.

The problems start at the brand level - the logo placement wastes prime screen space, adhering to outdated web conventions rather than prioritizing emergency access.

The app's navigation reveals dangerous confusion around emergency functions. Users face an ambiguous choice between 'Call for Help' and 'Emergency' buttons - a critical design flaw when seconds count. In a crisis, no one should have to guess which button connects them to help, or find CPR instructions scattered across different sections.

Life-Critical Communication Failures

The app's ambiguous emergency contact interface creates dangerous hesitation in critical moments. Users can't tell if tapping numbers will immediately dial emergency services or show more information.

Adding to the confusion, an unexplained 'person' icon appears next to emergency numbers, triggering unexpected contacts permission requests - mixing personal contacts with emergency services when clarity is most crucial.

The app's ambiguous emergency contact interface creates dangerous hesitation in critical moments. Users can't tell if tapping numbers will immediately dial emergency services or show more information.

Adding to the confusion, an unexplained 'person' icon appears next to emergency numbers, triggering unexpected contacts permission requests - mixing personal contacts with emergency services when clarity is most crucial.

The app's ambiguous emergency contact interface creates dangerous hesitation in critical moments. Users can't tell if tapping numbers will immediately dial emergency services or show more information.

Adding to the confusion, an unexplained 'person' icon appears next to emergency numbers, triggering unexpected contacts permission requests - mixing personal contacts with emergency services when clarity is most crucial.

First Aid Content: When Seconds Count

The app's inconsistent information architecture creates dangerous barriers to potentially life-saving content. While the app demonstrates some positive elements with clear typography and strong contrast ratios, these surface-level successes are undermined by fundamental structural issues that could impede emergency response.


The most critical issue lies in content burial. Life-saving information is hidden beneath multiple navigation layers, forcing users through an unnecessary maze of taps and swipes during potentially critical moments.

The app's inconsistent information architecture creates dangerous barriers to potentially life-saving content. While the app demonstrates some positive elements with clear typography and strong contrast ratios,

these surface-level successes are undermined by fundamental structural issues that could impede emergency response.

The most critical issue lies in content burial.

Life-saving information is hidden beneath multiple navigation layers,

forcing users through an unnecessary maze of taps and swipes during potentially critical moments. This archaic navigation pattern of lateral movement between screens contradicts modern mobile patterns and user expectations. Emergency content that requires immediate access is competing with non-urgent features for visibility.

The app's inconsistent information architecture creates dangerous barriers to potentially life-saving content. While the app demonstrates some positive elements with clear typography and strong contrast ratios,

these surface-level successes are undermined by fundamental structural issues that could impede emergency response.

The most critical issue lies in content burial.

Life-saving information is hidden beneath multiple navigation layers,

forcing users through an unnecessary maze of taps and swipes during potentially critical moments. This archaic navigation pattern of lateral movement between screens contradicts modern mobile patterns and user expectations. Emergency content that requires immediate access is competing with non-urgent features for visibility.

Critical Navigation Issues

Information Hierarchy

  • Life-saving content buried in nested levels

  • Unintuitive back-and-forth navigation

  • Critical information too many taps away

  • Non-urgent features taking priority

Suggested Architecture

  • Replace nested navigation with vertical scroll

  • Use progressive disclosure within topics

  • Surface critical content on home screen

  • Move non-urgent features to menu

Content Quality Issues

Inconsistent Information Delivery

  • Missing videos for crucial topics (e.g., CPR)

  • Unexplained medical terminology

  • Assumed knowledge in critical procedures

  • Unbalanced topic distribution (5 main vs 18 'other' topics)

Language Barriers

  • Medical jargon ("foreign body")

  • Technical terms ("non-adherent sterile dressing")

  • Missing practical examples

  • Unclear kit references

Media Format Effectiveness

Current State

  • Unclear optimal format choice

  • Video/text relationship undefined

  • Demonstration opportunities missed

  • Format effectiveness untested

Research Needs

  • User stress response studies

  • Information absorption patterns

  • Format effectiveness in emergencies

  • Best practices for critical instruction delivery

Secondary Features & Content Management Issues

For an emergency response app, reliability issues severely undermine user trust. Users face unexpected external redirects and frustrating loading delays across key features like Notifications and Immunization records.


When lives are at stake, these performance problems and unclear data handling practices aren't just inconvenient - they're potentially dangerous.

For an emergency response app, reliability issues severely undermine user trust. Users face unexpected external redirects and frustrating loading delays across key features like Notifications and Immunization records.


When lives are at stake, these performance problems and unclear data handling practices aren't just inconvenient - they're potentially dangerous.

For an emergency response app, reliability issues severely undermine user trust. Users face unexpected external redirects and frustrating loading delays across key features like Notifications and Immunization records.


When lives are at stake, these performance problems and unclear data handling practices aren't just inconvenient - they're potentially dangerous.

Competitive Analysis

When seconds count, how do users actually process emergency information? Our research into crisis communication revealed patterns that fundamentally challenged our assumptions about interface design. The findings reshaped our approach to emergency instruction delivery.

Speed of Access

The traditional approach of text-heavy instructions proves inadequate in crisis moments. Our analysis of 11 competitor apps revealed a clear pattern: speed of access dramatically outweighs comprehensiveness. First Aid Kits Australia demonstrated this perfectly with their search implementation, reducing access time from 37 seconds to just 3 seconds.

Current iFirstAid Path to Snake Bite Info: Open App → First Aid → Other Topics → Bites & Stings → Snake
(5 taps, ~37 seconds)

First Aid Kits Australia Path:Type "sna" → Select Snake Bite
(2 actions, ~3 seconds)

The traditional approach of text-heavy instructions proves inadequate in crisis moments. Our analysis of 11 competitor apps revealed a clear pattern: speed of access dramatically outweighs comprehensiveness. First Aid Kits Australia demonstrated this perfectly with their search implementation, reducing access time from 37 seconds to just 3 seconds.

Current iFirstAid Path to Snake Bite Info: Open App → First Aid → Other Topics → Bites & Stings → Snake
(5 taps, ~37 seconds)

First Aid Kits Australia Path:Type "sna" → Select Snake Bite
(2 actions, ~3 seconds)

The traditional approach of text-heavy instructions proves inadequate in crisis moments. Our analysis of 11 competitor apps revealed a clear pattern: speed of access dramatically outweighs comprehensiveness. First Aid Kits Australia demonstrated this perfectly with their search implementation, reducing access time from 37 seconds to just 3 seconds.

Current iFirstAid Path to Snake Bite Info: Open App → First Aid → Other Topics → Bites & Stings → Snake
(5 taps, ~37 seconds)

First Aid Kits Australia Path:Type "sna" → Select Snake Bite
(2 actions, ~3 seconds)

The Visual Language of Emergency

While conventional wisdom favored realistic imagery, our testing revealed that avatar-style illustrations actually performed better in emergency scenarios. They provided clear instruction without the potential distress that realistic medical imagery might cause during high-stress situations.

While conventional wisdom favored realistic imagery, our testing revealed that avatar-style illustrations actually performed better in emergency scenarios. They provided clear instruction without the potential distress that realistic medical imagery might cause during high-stress situations.

While conventional wisdom favored realistic imagery, our testing revealed that avatar-style illustrations actually performed better in emergency scenarios. They provided clear instruction without the potential distress that realistic medical imagery might cause during high-stress situations.

St. Johns Australia's approach to text presentation emerged as the gold standard, using what we termed progressive disclosure - revealing information in digestible chunks through side-scrolling with clear progress indicators. iFirst Aid uses arrows to assist the user. St Johns Australia uses dots which is of more benefit to the user as it shows where they are and how far they have to go.

St. Johns Australia's approach to text presentation emerged as the gold standard, using what we termed progressive disclosure - revealing information in digestible chunks through side-scrolling with clear progress indicators. iFirst Aid uses arrows to assist the user. St Johns Australia uses dots which is of more benefit to the user as it shows where they are and how far they have to go.

Offline Access

The apps were tested in airplane mode to assess their offline capabilities. While all the reviewed apps work offline, iFirst Aid has limitations. The "Call for Help" function doesn't work, and instructional videos are removed from their respective topics when offline.


iFirst Aid is the only app that allows users to download videos within the app. However, relying on users to download content goes against the principle of having all necessary information readily available within the app itself.

The apps were tested in airplane mode to assess their offline capabilities. While all the reviewed apps work offline, iFirst Aid has limitations. The "Call for Help" function doesn't work, and instructional videos are removed from their respective topics when offline.


iFirst Aid is the only app that allows users to download videos within the app. However, relying on users to download content goes against the principle of having all necessary information readily available within the app itself.

The apps were tested in airplane mode to assess their offline capabilities. While all the reviewed apps work offline, iFirst Aid has limitations. The "Call for Help" function doesn't work, and instructional videos are removed from their respective topics when offline.


iFirst Aid is the only app that allows users to download videos within the app. However, relying on users to download content goes against the principle of having all necessary information readily available within the app itself.

For V2, keep all essential information within the app - no downloads or external dependencies. Replace videos with clear text and image instructions to create a reliable first aid resource that works offline when users need it most.

For V2, keep all essential information within the app - no downloads or external dependencies. Replace videos with clear text and image instructions to create a reliable first aid resource that works offline when users need it most.

User Flow

User Interviews

User Interviews

User Interviews

We interviewed 20 diverse individuals to gain insights into their perspectives on first aid, their behavior in emergency situations, and their likelihood of using a first aid app. The interviewees were selected from various age groups and backgrounds to ensure a representative sample, as first aid is relevant to a broad audience.

To comprehensively understand user concerns, we asked a mix of open-ended and closed-ended questions. The responses were categorized into three main areas:


  1. Use during an emergency: We explored how users would interact with the app in critical situations and what features they would find most valuable.

  2. Content: We gathered information on the types of content users would expect to find in a first aid app and how they would prefer it to be presented.

  3. Learning and Preparedness: We investigated how users would utilize the app to learn about first aid and prepare themselves for potential emergencies.


By addressing these key areas, we aimed to create a narrative that highlights the essential findings from our user interviews, which will inform the development of a user-centric first aid application.

We interviewed 20 diverse individuals to gain insights into their perspectives on first aid, their behavior in emergency situations, and their likelihood of using a first aid app. The interviewees were selected from various age groups and backgrounds to ensure a representative sample, as first aid is relevant to a broad audience.

To comprehensively understand user concerns, we asked a mix of open-ended and closed-ended questions. The responses were categorized into three main areas:


  1. Use during an emergency: We explored how users would interact with the app in critical situations and what features they would find most valuable.

  2. Content: We gathered information on the types of content users would expect to find in a first aid app and how they would prefer it to be presented.

  3. Learning and Preparedness: We investigated how users would utilize the app to learn about first aid and prepare themselves for potential emergencies.


By addressing these key areas, we aimed to create a narrative that highlights the essential findings from our user interviews, which will inform the development of a user-centric first aid application.

We interviewed 20 diverse individuals to gain insights into their perspectives on first aid, their behavior in emergency situations, and their likelihood of using a first aid app. The interviewees were selected from various age groups and backgrounds to ensure a representative sample, as first aid is relevant to a broad audience.

To comprehensively understand user concerns, we asked a mix of open-ended and closed-ended questions. The responses were categorized into three main areas:


  1. Use during an emergency: We explored how users would interact with the app in critical situations and what features they would find most valuable.

  2. Content: We gathered information on the types of content users would expect to find in a first aid app and how they would prefer it to be presented.

  3. Learning and Preparedness: We investigated how users would utilize the app to learn about first aid and prepare themselves for potential emergencies.


By addressing these key areas, we aimed to create a narrative that highlights the essential findings from our user interviews, which will inform the development of a user-centric first aid application.

Key takeaways

→ 67% of people said it was essential to have access to first aid instruction, 33% said it was nice to have, and 0% said access to first aid instructions was dispensable.

→ 71% preferred accessing first aid information via an app that can be used offline.

→ 81% showed strong interest in having access to an app that improved first aid knowledge

→ 90% of people said they would ACT FIRST in an emergency vs. looking up first aid instructions.

Personas

User Flows

User Flows

User Flows

The previous user flow was convoluted and time-consuming, hindering users from accessing critical first aid information quickly. The requirement to log in and enable location settings before accessing the content was a significant drawback, especially in emergency situations where every second is precious. This design failed to address the urgent need for swift, easy access to first aid assistance, highlighting the necessity for a more streamlined approach.


The new flow ensures quick and easy access to first aid instructions, eliminating any navigational obstacles. Unnecessary sections that didn't directly contribute to the app's core purpose were removed, allowing users to bypass additional steps like logging in or enabling location services, which were previously considered hindrances, particularly in emergencies. It prioritizes delivering essential first aid information to users' fingertips with minimal effort, making the app a dependable tool in times of urgent need.

The previous user flow was convoluted and time-consuming, hindering users from accessing critical first aid information quickly. The requirement to log in and enable location settings before accessing the content was a significant drawback, especially in emergency situations where every second is precious. This design failed to address the urgent need for swift, easy access to first aid assistance, highlighting the necessity for a more streamlined approach.


The new flow ensures quick and easy access to first aid instructions, eliminating any navigational obstacles. Unnecessary sections that didn't directly contribute to the app's core purpose were removed, allowing users to bypass additional steps like logging in or enabling location services, which were previously considered hindrances, particularly in emergencies. It prioritizes delivering essential first aid information to users' fingertips with minimal effort, making the app a dependable tool in times of urgent need.

The previous user flow was convoluted and time-consuming, hindering users from accessing critical first aid information quickly. The requirement to log in and enable location settings before accessing the content was a significant drawback, especially in emergency situations where every second is precious. This design failed to address the urgent need for swift, easy access to first aid assistance, highlighting the necessity for a more streamlined approach.


The new flow ensures quick and easy access to first aid instructions, eliminating any navigational obstacles. Unnecessary sections that didn't directly contribute to the app's core purpose were removed, allowing users to bypass additional steps like logging in or enabling location services, which were previously considered hindrances, particularly in emergencies. It prioritizes delivering essential first aid information to users' fingertips with minimal effort, making the app a dependable tool in times of urgent need.

Wireframes

The primary objective was to offer prompt support to users. To achieve this, the topics page has been redesigned to greet users immediately upon launching the app.

Additionally, a prominently placed "call for help" button has been implemented, guaranteeing that users can swiftly request assistance whenever necessary.

Furthermore, the homepage now showcases the most critical topics, which are personalized based on user preferences, enabling them to quickly locate the essential information they require without any delay.

The primary objective was to offer prompt support to users. To achieve this, the topics page has been redesigned to greet users immediately upon launching the app.

Additionally, a prominently placed "call for help" button has been implemented, guaranteeing that users can swiftly request assistance whenever necessary.

Furthermore, the homepage now showcases the most critical topics, which are personalized based on user preferences, enabling them to quickly locate the essential information they require without any delay.

The primary objective was to offer prompt support to users. To achieve this, the topics page has been redesigned to greet users immediately upon launching the app.

Additionally, a prominently placed "call for help" button has been implemented, guaranteeing that users can swiftly request assistance whenever necessary.

Furthermore, the homepage now showcases the most critical topics, which are personalized based on user preferences, enabling them to quickly locate the essential information they require without any delay.

Improvements

Critical Transformation: Removing Emergency Barriers

Initial Design

  • Required authentication before showing any emergency content.

  • Users faced immediate video download decisions before seeing any app value

  • Initial language selection created unnecessary friction in emergency scenarios.

Final

  • Provides immediate access to critical information while moving optional features like account creation to a secondary flow.

  • Prioritizes instant information access, introducing optional content downloads only after users understand their purpose.

  • Detects device language automatically while maintaining easy access to language preferences for non-emergency situations.

Navigation: When Every Second Counts

Initial Design

  • Logo dominated valuable screen space

  • Emergency call button buried among other features

  • Duplicate functions: "Call for Help" vs "Emergency"

  • Cluttered navigation with non-emergency features

  • CPR instructions separated from main first aid flow

  • Travel guides and mental health competed for attention

  • Multiple navigation paths to same information

  • Ambiguous button purposes created hesitation

Final

  • Emergency call button persistent in top navigation

  • Logo removed to prioritize critical information

  • Single, clear path to emergency assistance

  • Non-essential features moved to secondary menu

  • All first aid procedures unified under one flow

  • Clean, focused emergency-first interface

  • Added what3words for the location

First Aid Content: Speed Through Clarity

Initial Design

  • Critical information buried 5 levels deep

  • Required back-and-forth navigation

  • Small, uniform buttons for all conditions

  • Hidden content behind multiple taps

  • Mixed emergency and non-emergency items

Final

  • All critical content visible on first screen

  • Single scroll replaces nested navigation

  • High-priority items visually emphasized

  • Emergency procedures given larger buttons

  • Color coding indicates urgency level

  • Important procedures instantly visible

  • Zero navigation depth for critical items

Secondary Features: Simplifying the Essential

Initial Design

  • Hamburger menu hid critical features

  • Redundant emergency buttons in different locations

  • Search buried in menu options

  • Many different functionality that doesn't work

Final

  • Critical functions moved to persistent top bar

  • Search always visible and accessible

  • Emergency call button permanently anchored

  • Mobile-first bottom navigation

  • Secondary features properly categorized

  • Clear, consistent back navigation

  • Simplified account access

  • Focused feature priority

First Aid Content: Speed Through Clarity

Initial Design

  • Inconsistent layout (videos, real life pictures, cartoons etc)

  • Non intuitive navigation with vertical scroll.

  • Not being able to see the full steps ahead of time.

Final

  • Used illustrations for instructions

  • Side scroll navigation (competitive research)

  • Full steps are shown ahead of time with the ability to jump into any step.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

The transformation of iFirstAid represents more than just a redesign - it marks a fundamental shift in emergency response tools. The results speak volumes: a 30% increase in downloads has positioned SURVIVAL as a market leader, with iFirstAid now ranking among the top first aid applications.


But this is just the beginning. Our roadmap focuses on making life-saving knowledge truly accessible to everyone: We're developing a comprehensive learning platform that transforms complex medical knowledge into digestible, engaging content. Accessibility sits at the heart of our future developments - from multi-language support to dark mode optimization, and enhanced visibility features for color-blind users.


Our vision is clear: emergency response tools shouldn't just exist - they should be instantly accessible and usable by anyone, anywhere, at any time. Every future feature will be measured against this core principle.


This isn't just about building a better app - it's about democratizing life-saving knowledge and ensuring that when seconds count, help is just one tap away.

The transformation of iFirstAid represents more than just a redesign - it marks a fundamental shift in emergency response tools. The results speak volumes: a 30% increase in downloads has positioned SURVIVAL as a market leader, with iFirstAid now ranking among the top first aid applications.


But this is just the beginning. Our roadmap focuses on making life-saving knowledge truly accessible to everyone: We're developing a comprehensive learning platform that transforms complex medical knowledge into digestible, engaging content. Accessibility sits at the heart of our future developments - from multi-language support to dark mode optimization, and enhanced visibility features for color-blind users.


Our vision is clear: emergency response tools shouldn't just exist - they should be instantly accessible and usable by anyone, anywhere, at any time. Every future feature will be measured against this core principle.


This isn't just about building a better app - it's about democratizing life-saving knowledge and ensuring that when seconds count, help is just one tap away.

The transformation of iFirstAid represents more than just a redesign - it marks a fundamental shift in emergency response tools. The results speak volumes: a 30% increase in downloads has positioned SURVIVAL as a market leader, with iFirstAid now ranking among the top first aid applications.


But this is just the beginning. Our roadmap focuses on making life-saving knowledge truly accessible to everyone: We're developing a comprehensive learning platform that transforms complex medical knowledge into digestible, engaging content. Accessibility sits at the heart of our future developments - from multi-language support to dark mode optimization, and enhanced visibility features for color-blind users.


Our vision is clear: emergency response tools shouldn't just exist - they should be instantly accessible and usable by anyone, anywhere, at any time. Every future feature will be measured against this core principle.


This isn't just about building a better app - it's about democratizing life-saving knowledge and ensuring that when seconds count, help is just one tap away.

Follow me on other channels

LinkedIn

Navigation

Home

About me

Work

Tools

Skills

Education

Case studies

[Beam] Design System

Rentrust

Payer Member Portal

© 2024 – anukuga

Follow me on other channels

LinkedIn

Navigation

Home

About me

Work

Tools

Skills

Education

Case studies

[Beam] Design System

Rentrust

Payer Member Portal

© 2024 – anukuga

Follow me on other channels

LinkedIn

Navigation

Home

About me

Work

Tools

Skills

Education

Case studies

[Beam] Design System

Rentrust

Payer Member Portal

© 2024 – anukuga